News

U.S. Sentencing Commission Update – Retroactivity Possible?

Categories: Featured, Newsroom, Press Release

Good news on the sentencing guidelines front!  On August 15, the U.S. Sentencing Commission decided which guideline changes they want to focus on in 2014 and one of them is to reduce all drug sentences by two levels!

As you might remember, each year the U.S. Sentencing Commission, which writes the federal Sentencing Guidelines, suggests changes to the guidelines. These are known as guideline amendments.  The process starts when the Commission publishes a list of proposed priorities – issues it wants to tackle – and asks the public for feedback on whether that list is right. Thanks to you, the Commission received more than 14,000 letters from the public! It’s important that the Commissioners know the public is paying attention to what they do and that their actions matter to thousands.  

The proposed guideline reform of “all drugs minus two,” is especially exciting because it has the potential to become retroactive, but not until November 2014, at the earliest.

For now, the Commission has decided to review and POSSIBLY amend drug sentencing guidelines “across drug types.” This means the sentencing guidelines for all drugs would be lowered by two full levels. For instance, drug quantities that used to trigger a level 26 would now trigger a level 24.  And, as you know, each guideline level corresponds to a sentencing range, so if the level goes down, so does the sentencing range.  This change is a longstanding FAMM priority that we have urged the Commission to act on. 

The reason we believe this guideline change could be made retroactive is because in 2007, the Commission lowered the federal crack cocaine sentence guideline by two full levels and made that change retroactive so that prisoners serving time for crack cocaine offenses could go back to court and request sentence reductions.  This happened again in 2010, when the Commission adopted new guidelines to comply with the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA).  In both cases, federal prisoners were able to petition the sentencing court to lower their sentences to bring them in line with the new guidelines. These changes helped a lot of people.  The 2007 reforms enabled over 16,500 prisoners to receive sentence reductions averaging over two years.  The 2010 reforms have so far enabled over 7,300 prisoners to secure sentence reductions averaging 29 months.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? HERE IS WHAT WE HOPE WILL HAPPEN

  • At some point before Spring 2014, the U.S. Sentencing Commission will do two things: 1. Publish a proposed amendment to the federal sentencing guidelines that would recommend lowering all drug sentences by two levels, and invite the public to comment in writing about the proposal. We will be asking you to write in support of this amendment (and any others you support) at that time.
    2. Hold a hearing about potential federal sentencing guideline amendments, at which FAMM will testify.   
  • On May 1, 2014, the Commission will send to Congress the final set of guideline amendments the Commission recommends.  Congress has until November 1, 2014 to reject the changes. 
  • Probably before Nov. 1, 2014, the Commission will consider (if it has sent lowered drug guidelines to Congress) whether to make the lower drug guidelines retroactive.  It could: 1.  Hold a hearing; 2.  Solicit public comment. We will be asking you to write and support retroactivity if this happens.
  • On November 1, 2014, if Congress has not rejected the Commission’s proposed guideline changes, they will become law. 
  • If the “all drugs minus two” guideline becomes law on November 1, 2014, and if the Commission has voted to make the change retroactive, it could delay the start of retroactivity, as it has done in the past. This means that retroactivity of any drug guideline changes may not happen until late 2014 or 2015. Delaying retroactivity could ensure that the prisoners, prisons, courts, prosecutors and defense counsel have time to do the work necessary to ensure motions are submitted and considered in an orderly fashion.

This is a lot to absorb but it is very exciting! Whatever happens, we will keep you posted on all the developments and tell you when we need letters from you and your families. 

For now, just remember that nothing has changed yet and there are no guarantees that they will but we are going to do our best to see that something good happens for prisoners!   

FAMM will keep you updated on our website, famm.org.

 

2,441 responses to “U.S. Sentencing Commission Update – Retroactivity Possible?

  1. I have really learned new things through the blog post. One other thing I have recognized is that generally, FSBO sellers may reject an individual. Remember, they can prefer to not ever use your expert services. But if a person maintain a steady, professional partnership, offering support and keeping contact for around four to five weeks, you will usually be capable of win an interview. From there, a house listing follows. Cheers

  2. It’s awesome to pay a quick visit this web page and reading the views of all friends regarding this article, while I
    am also zealous of getting familiarity.

  3. Admiring the time and effort you put into your site and detailed information you provide.

    It’s awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same old rehashed information. Excellent read!
    I’ve saved your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  4. I simply could not leave your site before suggesting that I actually loved the usual information an individual supply on your visitors?

    Is gonna be again steadily to check out new posts

  5. When someone writes an piece of writing he/she retains the idea
    of a user in his/her mind that how a user can be aware of it.
    Therefore that’s why this piece of writing is perfect.
    Thanks!

  6. Howdy! This post could not be written any better!
    Reading through this post reminds me of my good old room mate!
    He always kept talking about this. I will forward this post to him.

    Fairly certain he will have a good read. Many thanks for sharing!

  7. With havin so much content do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or
    copyright violation? My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either created
    myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping
    it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any ways to help stop content from being stolen? I’d truly
    appreciate it.

  8. Have you ever thought about creating an e-book or guest authoring on other sites?
    I have a blog based on the same subjects you discuss
    and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my visitors would appreciate
    your work. If you’re even remotely interested,
    feel free to shoot me an e mail.

  9. Sweet blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News.
    Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?

    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to
    get there! Thank you

  10. 34 year-old Information and Company Specialists Donahey from Angus, enjoys to spend time electronics, 바카라사이트 and collecting music albums.
    Keeps a tour blog and has lots to write about
    after planing a trip to Durham Castle and Cathedral.

  11. Attractive part of content. I simply stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to claim that I get in fact enjoyed
    account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing in your augment or even I
    achievement you get admission to constantly rapidly.

  12. Superb blog! Do you have any recommendations for aspiring
    writers? I’m hoping to start my own blog soon but I’m a little lost on everything.

    Would you recommend starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for
    a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m completely overwhelmed ..

    Any suggestions? Cheers!

  13. Whoa! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It’s on a entirely different topic but it has pretty much the
    same page layout and design. Excellent choice of colors!

  14. I am really impressed with your writing skills and also with the
    layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?
    Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.

  15. [url=http://www.bojanas.info/sixtyone/forum/upload/member.php?u=708712]onlinedatingsites.us.com[/url]

  16. n0y5xd maglie calcio 0w3co9rk 69rdgz fotbollstrjor barn 1r3ga6ed28 lhi3emrnc fodboldtrojer
    ka0jd6ge9 x579avgh6 fotballdrakter barn 7986b4efd gah4iznlv billige fodboldtrojer z1okunpmj0
    b67w53al billiga fotbollstrjor fj067h trx6gsok4d maglie calcio poco prezzo x7pu01eyz fs7eluwck billige fotballdrakter sw0v5kub

  17. wh0cd79550 [url=http://cheapcephalexin.doctor/]buy keflex[/url] [url=http://buykamagra.doctor/]kamagra[/url] [url=http://ordertadalafil.doctor/]order tadalafil[/url] [url=http://lisinoprilonline.doctor/]go here[/url] [url=http://orderviagra.doctor/]generic viagra professional[/url] [url=http://cefixime.doctor/]cefixime[/url] [url=http://buyelimite.doctor/]elimite[/url]

  18. r5gcjwkn1 fodboldtrojer born 3cxf6dbok1 n0k9wc maglie calcio poco prezzo
    0wlh3z 3xbyuso2n6 fotballdrakter barn i2vrea3 7x93ft fotbollstrjor barn t6yuwq3rxd umdfz7sp billige fotballdrakter jm6uz1kaq a0sc4l9mwi billiga fotbollstrjor xnkl87f 09lb3j1h fodboldtrojer o6d5s4lfq7 it7l1uas maglie calcio mnc9yt13ba

  19. 4gjszl billiga fotbollstrjor r1skzctv4 k4628u maglie calcio poco prezzo gwh4eivdpc w49zvdln0 billige fotballdrakter 8r2zbs3 2ts4fwm billige fodboldtrojer rai7dfjok gc6lpr8o maglie calcio poco prezzo qf0z3nti wgt0p6hsk9 billige
    fodboldtrojer yf5v1i0 jrd3ek10z fotballdrakter barn m6wx9qk8i
    jsw3v4f0e5 billiga fotbollstrjor pau2yf5cxo

  20. At this time it looks like BlogEngine is the best blogging platform out there right now.

    (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using on your blog?